图书馆研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 124-128.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5197(2019)05-0124-05

• 文献考论与计量 • 上一篇    

论南昌府本《十三经注疏》对底本的修正——以《毛诗注疏》为例

吴雪菡   

  1. 山东大学儒学高等研究院,山东 济南 250100
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-11 出版日期:2020-01-16 发布日期:2020-01-16
  • 作者简介:吴雪菡(1997-),女,山东大学儒学高等研究院古典文献学专业在读硕士研究生,研究方向:十三经版本。

The Discussion about Modification of the Notes and Examinations of thirteen Classics published by Nanchang prefectural School from the base Edition:the Commentary and Subcommentary of Mao Poetry as an Example

WU Xue-han   

  1. Advanced Institute of Confucian Studies,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China
  • Received:2019-03-11 Online:2020-01-16 Published:2020-01-16

摘要: 南昌府学所刊《十三经注疏》,是统合历代经疏刊刻的集大成之作。阮元出其所藏“宋本”《十三经》付梓,实际此本为粗糙拙劣的元刊明修本。南昌府本对元刊明修本有补正之功,主要体现在墨钉修补、讹字修正和字形规范三个方面。总体来看,南昌府本《十三经注疏》校刊精良,接近宋本,字形规范,具有较高的参考价值。

关键词: 南昌府学;十三经注疏;毛诗注疏;元刊明修本

Abstract: The notes and examinations of thirteen classics published by Nanchang prefectural school are of great significance. RUAN Yuan published the 13 sutras of the edition of Song collected by himself. In fact, this edition is a bad one. The edition published by Nanchang prefectural school is good. It is embodied most strongly in the blank repairing , wrong correcting and characters normalization.In a word,the 13 sutras published by Nanchang prefectural school have higher reference value.

Key words: Nanchang prefectural school;?the?notes?and?examinations?of?thirteen?classics;?the?commentary?and?subcommentary?of?Mao?poetry;edition of Yuan and Ming

中图分类号: 

  • G256.2