“互联网+”环境下高校图书馆学科化服务转型探索 *——以MOOC为例

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以MOOC为切入点,通过梳理国内外图书馆学科化服务现状及存在的问题指出开展线上学科化服务的必要性;从资源支持、技术支持、馆员支持和服务内容支持4方面分析了高校图书馆开展线上学科化服务的可行性,并结合高校图书馆具备的条件,从线上基本需求服务、MOOC微信管理服务、MOOC推广服务、MOOC数据管理服务和MOOC信息素养教育服务5个方面提出线上学科化服务的内容构想,为高校图书馆学科化服务建设转型提供参考。

关键词: 学科化服务, MOOC, 高校图书馆, 互联网+

Abstract:

With MOOC as the entry point, by analyzing the current situation and existing problems of subject service for university libraries, this paper points out the necessity of carrying out the online subject service. And then it analyzes the feasibility of university library to carry out the online subject service from four aspects of resource support, technical support, librarians support and service content support. According to the qualifications of university libraries, this paper proposes the content of online subject service. Combined with MOOC, The paper presented that the key point of construction should be Online service of basic needs, WeChat management services for MOOC, spread service for MOOC, data management services for MOOC, information literacy education services for MOOC, and can also provide reference to promote Transformation for subject service of University Library.

Key words: subject service, MOOC, university Library, internet +

中图分类号:

G252

侯林丽. “互联网+”环境下高校图书馆学科化服务转型探索 ^*——以MOOC为例[J]. 图书馆研究, 2018, 48(5): 97-101.

HOU Lin-li. Probe of Transformation for University Library's Subject Service: Taking MOOC as an Example[J]. Library Research, 2018, 48(5): 97-101.

图/表 2

参考文献 21

[1]	SCHWARTZ M. Massive open opportunity: Supporting MOOCs in public and academic Libraries[EB/OL].[ 2015- 02- 11].
[2]	PUJAR S M, TADASAD P G . MOOCs: an opportunity for international collaboration in LIS education: A developing country’s perspective[J]. New Library World, 2016,117(5/6):360-373. doi: 10.1108/NLW-07-2015-0048
[3]	SAWANT S . Non library oriented MOOCs useful for LIS professionals and students[J]. Library Hi Tech News, 2017,34(9):19-20.
[4]	崔林蔚, 李玲, 李佳潞 , 等. 国内外图书馆参与MOOC课程建设实践综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017,61(2):144-151. doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.02.019
[5]	秦鸿 . MOOCs 的兴起及图书馆的角色[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014(2):19-26. doi: 10.13530/j.cnki.jlis.140007
[6]	Columbia University Libraries [EB/OL].[ 2018- 02- 25]. http://library.columbia.edu/
[7]	Chen Mingyue, MAKANI J, BLIEMELl M . A subject specialist-centric model for library resources management in academic libraries[J]. Library Review, 2016: 65(4/5):281-294. doi: 10.1108/LR-08-2015-0084
[8]	欧阳瑜玉 . 美国著名大学图书馆学科服务的特点[J]. 图书馆建设, 2010(12):73-76.
[9]	王焕景, 孙兴敏 . 中外图书馆学科服务研究对比分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017,61(8):43-53. doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.08.005
[10]	杨俊丽 . “互联网+”背景下图书馆学科化服务的协同创新[J]. 现代情报, 2017,37(2):89-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2017.02.017
[11]	侯林丽 . “互联网+”环境下大学生对MOOC接受与使用现状的调查与分析[J]. 图书馆界, 2017(4):8-12,36.
[12]	OCLC. MOOCs and Libraries: Massive Opportunity or Overwhelming Challenge?[EB/OL].[ 2018- 02- 25]. http://www.oclc.org/research/events/2013/03-18.html
[13]	WU K . Academic libraries in the age of MOOCs[J]. Reference Services Review, 2013,41(3):576-587. doi: 10.1108/RSR-03-2013-0015
[14]	STEPHENS M . MOOCs for LIS professional development: Exploring new transformative learning environments and roles[J]. Internet Learning, 2013,2(2):72-88.
[15]	龚晓林, 张丹 . MOOC环境下高校图书馆教参资源建设探讨[J]. 图书情报知识, 2015(6):61-66. doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2015.06.061
[16]	秦鸿 . MOOCs 的兴起及图书馆的角色[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014(2):19-26. doi: 10.13530/j.cnki.jlis.140007
[17]	侯林丽 . 基于信息生态链的高校图书馆本土化MOOC服务研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2016(7):63-67. doi: 10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2016.7.011
[18]	CALHOUN K . Being a librarian: metadata and metadata specialists in the twenty-first century[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2007,25(2):174-187. doi: 10.1108/07378830710754947
[19]	SCHUBERT C, SHORISH Y, FRANKEL P, GILES K . The evolution of research data: strategies for curation and data management[J]. Library Hi Tech News, 2013,30(6):1-6. doi: 10.1108/LHTN-06-2013-0035
[20]	CURDT C, HOFFMEISTER D . Research data management services for a multidisciplinary, collaborative research project: Design and implementation of the TR32DB project database[J]. Electronic Library and Information Systems, 2015,49(4):494-512. doi: 10.1108/PROG-02-2015-0016
[21]	GUSS S . A Studio Model for Academic Data Services[EB/OL]. [2018-02-25]. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=university-libraries-publications

优缺点课程类型	优点	缺点
MOOCs	大规模、公开免费、有互动、有评价,是一门完整的课程。课程完成后有学分或证书。在线课堂+录播视频	学生自主参与、中途弃课率高
微课	10~15分钟的短视频、单一碎片化的知识点。以录播课为主,偶有在线课堂	无互动、无评价、学生自主参与、无课堂参与感、学后无学分或证书
直播课	课堂参与感强、完整系统的知识点+习题互动及时、有评价、在线课堂	学生自主参与、学后没有证书或学分