Library Research ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 1-7.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5197(2021)02-0001-07
• Academic Research •
ZHANG Yao-kun,XU Ruo-qing
Received:
2020-11-04
Online:
2021-03-30
Published:
2021-05-26
CLC Number:
ZHANG Yao-kun,XU Ruo-qing. The Utilization Strategy of Academic Social Network in Chinese Academic Libraries:Investigation and Analysis of "Double First-Class" Universities[J].Library Research, 2021, 51(2): 1-7.
[1]Van Noorden R. Online collaboration: scientists and the social network[J].Nature,2014,512(7513):126-129.[2]Bullinger A.C., Hallerstede S.H., Renken U., et al. Towards research collaboration: a taxonomy of social research network sites[C]. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems,Lima, Peru,August 12-15,2010.[3]韩文,刘畅,雷秋雨.分析学术社交网络对科研活动的辅助作用——以 ResearchGate 和 Academia.edu 为例[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(8):105-111.[4]康福婷.学术社交媒体在图书馆科研服务中的应用研究——以ResearchGate 为例[J].高校图书馆工作,2017(4):85–89.[5]张耀坤,胡方丹,刘继云.科研人员在线社交网络使用行为研究综述[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(3):138-147.[6]Kjellberg S.,Haider J.,Sundin O.Researchers’use of social network sites: a scoping review[J]. Library & Information Science Research,2016,38(3):224–234.[7]夏秋菊,栗文超,薛晶晶.面向学术领域的新型社交平台科研社交网络[J].情报杂志,2014(9):167-172.[8]Jamali H.R. Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles[J]. Scientometrics,2017,112(1):241-254.[9]教育部,财政部,国家发展改革委.关于公布世界一流大学和一流学科建设高校及建设学科名单的通知[EB/OL]. [2017- 9- 21].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_843/201709/t20170921_314942.html.[10]耿斌,孙建军.在线学术社交平台的用户行为研究——以ResearchGate平台南京大学用户为例[J].图书与情报,2017(5):47-53.[11]宋钰,王锦明.基于科研社交网络平台关注情况的分析与思考——以ResearchGate 平台东南大学用户为例[J].新世纪图书馆,2018(4):46-50.[12]刘雯.学者在线科研交流行为研究——以Research-Gate平台东北大学用户为例[J].图书馆学刊,2019,41(3):118-125.[13]邓胜利,仝晶晶.学术社交网络用户使用行为及平台影响力差异研究——以武汉大学为例[J].数字图书馆论坛,2019(11):3-11.[14]Thelwall M., Kousha K. ResearchGate: Disseminating,communicating, and measuring Scholarship?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2015,66(5):876-889.[15]白春礼.科学大数据国家发展战略:序[J].中国科学院院刊,2018,33(8):766-767.[16]张耀南,程国栋,肖洪浪.高端计算机网络共享系统支撑的科学和工程革新[J].地球科学,2007(5): 527-531.[17]孙建军,张阳.科学大数据:范式重塑与价值实现[J].图书与情报,2017(5):20-26.[18]Thelwall M., Kousha K. ResearchGate versus Google Scholar: which finds more early citations?[J]. Scientometrics,2017,112(2):1125-1131.[19]Like, Share, Discover: Facebook for scientists[EB/OL].[2020-7-25]. https://www.npr.org/2011/04/18/1355138 03/like-share-learn-facebook-for-scientists.[20]Harnad S., Brody T., Vallieres F., et al. The green and gold roads to open access[J]. Serials Review, 2004,30(4):310-314.[21]Lee J., Oh S., Dong H. Motivations for self-archiving on an academic social networking site:a study on Research-Gate[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2019,70(6):563-574.[22]Okret-Manville C. Academic social networks and open access: french researchers at the crossroads[J]. LIBER Quarterly,25(3):118–135.[23]Bj?rk B.Gold,green,and black open access[J].Learned Publishing,2017,30(2):173-175.[24]黄如花.利用开放存取资源提升馆藏质量[J].中国图书馆学报,2008,34(5):26-32.[25]陈玲洪.高校图书馆开放存取资源揭示现状调查与实施策略研究[J].图书馆,2014(2):67-69.[26]李玲丽,吴新年,张甫.开放型科研社交网络应用调查与分析——以Academia.edu 为例[J].情报资料工作,2013,34(1):90-93.[27]Williams A.E.,Woodacre M.A.The possibilities and perils of academic social networking sites[J].Online Information Review,2016,40(2):282-294.[28]Eva,N.C.,Wiebe,T.A.Whose research is it anyway?academic social networks versus institutional repositories[J].Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication,2019(7):22-43. |
|