图书馆研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 1-5.

• •    下一篇

对“图书馆员去职业化”及其研究的反思

王梅   

  1. 山东理工大学图书馆,山东淄博255049
  • 发布日期:2019-04-28
  • 作者简介:王梅(1967-),女,副研究馆员,研究方向:图书馆学、情报学。

Reflection on Deprofessionalization of Librarians

WANG Mei (Shandong University of Science and Technology Library, Zibo 255049, China)   

  • Published:2019-04-28

摘要: 在中国,图书馆员没有职业化,何来"去职业化"及研究?中国图书馆还没有进入"职业化"——法律的界定,"图书馆员去职业化"及研究是"非理性"的。然而,中国图书馆和图书馆员事实上的职业化是存在的,图书馆员职业是图书馆员赖以生存的物质来源、是图书馆员善心悦目的精神基石、是图书馆员朝夕相伴的职业港湾。业务外包是图书馆员去职业化的风险投资与不当支出,图书馆员"职业边缘化"及研究具有客观性,"图书馆员去职业化"及研究却是虚妄的。面对着中国图书馆职业"边缘化"的趋势和风险,应该推进图书馆员职业化,而图书馆员"去职业化"研究应该滞后。

关键词: 图书馆 图书馆员 职业化 去职业化 边缘化

Abstract: In China, librarians have no "professionalization" and the research on "librarian professionalization" is irrational. However, China libraries and librarians , in fact, exist the professionalization of librarians that is a material source of librarians" survival, is a spiritual foundation stone of librarians" kindness and pleasing to the eye, is a bay of librarians' daily professional activites. Business outsoureing is improper to librarians taking a professional risk of investment and spending, the research on marginalization of librarians is objective and deprofcssionalization of librarians is unrealistic . Facing to marginalization of librarians, librarians ought to propel librarians " professionalization" and let the research on deprofessionalization of librarians to lag behind.

Key words: library; librarian; professionalization of librarians; deprofessionalization of librarians; marginalization of librarians

中图分类号: 

  • G251.3