图书馆研究

图书馆研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5): 110-116.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5197（2020）05-0110-07

• 文献考论与计量 • 上一篇    下一篇

论文合作方式影响被引频次吗？*——基于数字图书馆领域的统计分析

陈廉芳   

  1. 福建医科大学图书馆,福建 福州 350122
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-16 出版日期:2020-09-30 发布日期:2020-12-12
  • 作者简介:陈廉芳(1980-)，男，副研究馆员, 硕士，研究方向：高校图书馆科研支持服务。

Analysis of the Influence of Paper Cooperation Mode on Citation Frequency：Based on statistics in the field of digital libraries

CHEN Lian-fang   

  1. Fujian Medical University Library, Fujian 350122, China
  • Received:2019-12-16 Online:2020-09-30 Published:2020-12-12

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

556

赞

摘要： 探索数字图书馆领域不同合作方式的论文被引频次差异性，为研究人员提供有关论文合作的参考。使用SPSS软件，应用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验两种非参数检验方法。发现论文合作方式对被引频次有如下影响：作者人数为2或3的要显著高于独著的，单位内合作与单位间合作无显著差异；馆员为第一作者的，馆员与馆员合作无显著差异于馆员与教师的合作，教师为第一作者的情况也一样；合作对不同基金级别论文的被引频次影响呈现不同，无基金的有显著差异，有基金的无显著差异；合作对不同等级影响因子论文的被引频次影响呈现不同，中间级别的有显著差异，两端无显著差异。

关键词: 合著；合作；被引频次；数字图书馆

Abstract: Exploring the differences of citation frequency of digital library papers in different cooperation modes, and providing reference for researchers. SPSS software was used for Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test. It is found that the way of paper cooperation has the following effects on cited frequency. Firstly, the citation frequencies of papers with 2 or 3 authors are significantly higher than these with only one author, and the citation frequencies are no significant difference between intra and inter unit cooperation. Secondly, in the case where the librarian is the first author, the citation frequencies of papers with cooperation between librarians and librarians are not significantly different from these between librarians and teachers.The same is true for the teacher as the first author. Thirdly, there are differences in the impact of cooperation on the citation frequency of papers at different fund levels, with significant difference for those without fund and no significant difference for those with fund. Fourthly, there are differences in the impact of the citation frequency on the papers of different grades of impact factor, with significant difference in the middle level and no significant difference at both ends.

Key words: co-authorship; cooperation; citation frequency; digital library

中图分类号: 

  • G250