图书馆研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 85-93.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5197(2021)03-0085-09

• 信息资源服务 • 上一篇    下一篇

高校科技查新服务定价调查及收费标准问题

安 琪   

  1. 东南大学经济管理学院,江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-30 出版日期:2021-05-30 发布日期:2021-07-21
  • 作者简介:安琪(1997-),女,硕士研究生在读,研究方向:图书馆服务。

Investigation on Pricing and Charging Standards of University Sci-tech Novelty Retrieval Service

AN Qi   

  1. School of Economics and Management,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China
  • Received:2020-11-30 Online:2021-05-30 Published:2021-07-21

摘要: 以教育部批准设立且数据可获取的71所教育部部级科技查新工作站为研究对象,通过网络调研访问查新站主页的方式,调查当前高校科技查新服务的定价情况,从定价因素、地区差异、机构类型差异、定价依据与方法角度进行分析,发现查新定价中存在的不合理因素,查新收费存在定价因素混乱、定价机制不合理、定价方法欠科学等问题,以此为基础提出了政府指导定价、差异化定价和弹性化定价的收费策略。并提出相应合理的收费策略,为科技查新服务的科学、合理定价提供参考。

关键词: 科技查新;查新站;查新定价;收费标准

Abstract: Taking 71 ministerial-level sci-tech novelty retrieval workstations approved by the Ministry of Education as the research object,this paper investigate the current pricing situation of sci-tech novelty retrieval services in universities by visiting the homepage of novelty retrieval workstations on the Internet,analyze them from the perspectives of pricing factors,regional differences,institutional types,pricing basis and methods,find out there are some unreasonable factors in the pricing of novelty retrieval,some problems in the pricing of novelty retrieval,such as confusion of pricing factors,unreasonable pricing mechanism and unscientific pricing method.On this basis,the charging strategies of government guided pricing,differentiated pricing and flexible pricing are put forward.And put forward the corresponding reasonable charging strategy to provide reference for scientific and reasonable pricing of sci-tech novelty retrieval service.

Key words: sci-tech novelty retrieval service;novelty retrieval station;novelty retrieval pricing;charge standard

中图分类号: 

  • G252.62