图书馆研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 1-10.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5197(2019)05-0001-10

• 学术探讨 •    下一篇

开放获取视域下主体权益博弈困境及其破解研究*——以学术期刊为例

蒋永福,王丽培   

  1. 黑龙江大学信息管理学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-27 出版日期:2020-01-16 发布日期:2020-01-16
  • 作者简介:王丽培(1993-),女,2017级图书馆学硕士研究生,研究方向:图书馆学基础理论;蒋永福(1961—),男,信息资源管理研究中心主任,教授,研究方向:图书馆学基础理论,中国古代图书馆学研究。

The Difficulties and Solutions of the Game of Subject Rights and Interests from the Perspective of Open Access:Taking Academic Journals as an Example

JIANG Yong-fu,WANG Li-pei   

  1. School of Information Management, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China
  • Received:2019-05-27 Online:2020-01-16 Published:2020-01-16

摘要: 互联网协同研究范式的盛行引领学术期刊服务的创新,知识文化传播进入本质性的数字化转型期。学术期刊开放获取出版是符合时代发展的文化传播模式,均衡学术期刊开放获取多方主体间权益关系是学术期刊开放获取发展的瓶颈。文章利用三方动态博弈,探究读者、作者与期刊机构多方主体间的博弈关系,运用博弈模型剖析学术期刊开放获取过程中的各类纠纷问题,采用演化博弈方法推演影响权益主体行为的因素及困境表现,通过绘制主体期望效益的函图像,分析学术期刊开放获取过程中演化稳定策略的主体选择,以期用实证研究范式为困境破解研究提供理论指导。

关键词: 学术期刊, 开放获取, 权益博弈, 演化策略

Abstract: The prevalence of Internet collaborative research paradigm leads to the innovation of academic journal services, and the dissemination of knowledge and culture has entered the essential digital transformation period. Open access publication of academic journals is a cultural communication mode in line with the development of The Times. Articles by using the dynamic game, explore the readers, authors and journals, the game relation between various main use of game model analysis in the process of open access journals, all kinds of disputes with evolutionary game method inference factors, which affect the rights and interests of main body behavior and predicament, by drawing main expected benefits of functional image, analysis of open access academic journal evolutionary stable strategy in the process of subject selection, in order to use empirical research paradigm to provide theoretical guidance for the research of trouble cracking.

Key words: academic journals, open access, Equity game, evolutionary strategy

中图分类号: 

  • G250