图书馆研究

图书馆研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 119-123.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5197(2019)06-0119-05

• 四库学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

《初目》著录《总目》春秋类未收提要小考*

罗毅峰   

  1. 上海科学技术文献出版社，上海 200040
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-07 出版日期:2020-03-11 发布日期:2020-02-20
  • 作者简介:罗毅峰(1993—)，男，文学硕士，研究方向：四库学。

An analysis of the Chunqiu bibliographic recoded in Chumu unseen in Zongmu

LUO Yi-feng   

  1. Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature Press，Shanghai 200040，China
  • Received:2019-08-07 Online:2020-03-11 Published:2020-02-20

PDF (PC)

435

赞

摘要： 《四库全书初次进呈存目》作为早期的四库提要汇编稿，与最后纂定成书的《四库全书总目》差异颇大，篇目的删略以及类目调整就是个中体现之一。以《初目》春秋类著录为例，《春秋贯玉》因内容评价过低致使未能收入《总目》，馆臣又依据图书内容分析，在《总目》中将《春秋列国诸臣传》《春秋名臣传》《春秋列传》《左略》分别调整至合适的分类，纠正了以往目录书分类的疏误，体现了馆臣的目录学思想。尽管与《总目》相比，《初目》还存在一些缺陷，但也不能因此否定其学术贡献。

关键词: 《四库全书初次进呈存目》；《四库全书总目》；春秋类提要

Abstract: As an early collection of Siku Quanshu?bibliographics,?Siku?Quanshu?Chucijinchengcunmu?(hereinafter referred to as?Chumu) is quite different from?Siku?QuanshuZongmu(hereinafter referred to as Zongmu). And the content adjustment is one of the embodiments. Take the Chunqiu records in?Chumu?for example,?Chunqiuguanyu?was taken out of?Zongmufor its low evaluation. Besides, Siku officials adjust?Chunqiulieguo?Zhuchenzhuan,?Chunqiu?Mingchenzhuan,?Chunqiu?Liezhuan?and?Zuolve?to the appropriate categories in?Zongmu, which corrects the classification errors of previous bibliography books and shows the bibliographical thought of officials. Compared with?Zongmu,?Chumu?has some defects, however, its academic contribution should not be ignored.

Key words: Siku?Quanshu?Chucijinchengcunmu; Siku Quanshu Zongmu; Chunqiu bibliographics

中图分类号: 

  • G256